Neutral atomic-carbon QSO absorption-line systems at z>1.5: Sample selection, HI content, reddening, and 2175 A extinction feature
C. Ledoux, P. Noterdaeme, P. Petitjean, R. Srianand

TL;DR
This study systematically searches for neutral-carbon absorption lines in high-redshift QSOs to understand the properties, HI content, dust, and extinction features of these systems, revealing their relation to star formation and dust production in early galaxies.
Contribution
It introduces a new sample of 66 CI absorbers at z>1.5 identified without prior HI assumptions, analyzing their HI content, dust, and extinction features, and exploring their evolution and relation to star formation.
Findings
CI systems are rarer than DLAs but increase below z=2.
Most CI systems are sub-DLAs with significant dust content.
The 2175 Å extinction feature is present in about 30% of CI absorbers.
Abstract
We present the results of a search for cold gas at high redshift along QSO lines-of-sight carried out without any a priori assumption on the neutral atomic-hydrogen (HI) content of the absorbers. To do this, we systematically looked for neutral-carbon (CI) 1560,1656 transition lines in low-resolution QSO spectra from the SDSS database. We built up a sample of 66 CI absorbers with redshifts 1.5<z<3.1 and equivalent widths 0.1<W_r(1560)<1.7 A. The completeness limit of our survey is W_r,lim(1560)~0.4 A. CI systems stronger than that are more than one hundred-times rarer than DLAs at z_abs=2.5. The number of CI systems per unit redshift increases significantly below z=2. We suggest that the CI absorbers are closely related to the process of star formation and the production of dust in galaxies. We derive the HI content of the CI systems and find that a majority of them are sub-DLAs with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
