Theory of Semi-Instantiation in Abstract Argumentation
D. M. Gabbay

TL;DR
This paper develops a theoretical framework for semi-instantiated abstract argumentation, integrating logical formulas into argumentation frameworks and proposing methods to identify complete extensions.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to instantiate abstract argumentation with various logics and develops algorithms for computing complete extensions within this framework.
Findings
Defined properties of semi-instantiated argumentation systems
Developed algorithms for finding complete extensions
Compared new framework with existing literature
Abstract
We study instantiated abstract argumentation frames of the form , where is an abstract argumentation frame and where the arguments of are instantiated by as well formed formulas of a well known logic, for example as Boolean formulas or as predicate logic formulas or as modal logic formulas. We use the method of conceptual analysis to derive the properties of our proposed system. We seek to define the notion of complete extensions for such systems and provide algorithms for finding such extensions. We further develop a theory of instantiation in the abstract, using the framework of Boolean attack formations and of conjunctive and disjunctive attacks. We discuss applications and compare critically with the existing related literature.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Logic, programming, and type systems
