On the equivalence of phase-oscillator and integrate-and-fire models
Antonio Politi, Michael Rosenblum

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates a near-perfect quantitative equivalence between different oscillator models, including integrate-and-fire and phase models, in the weak-coupling limit, and shows the generality of self-consistent partial synchronization across models.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison showing the models' agreement and introduces a method to transform integrate-and-fire models with arbitrary pulse shapes into simpler delta-pulse models.
Findings
Models agree almost perfectly in the weak-coupling limit.
Self-consistent partial synchronization occurs across all model classes.
Integrate-and-fire models can be transformed into delta-pulse models with a suitable phase response curve.
Abstract
A quantitative comparison of various classes of oscillators (integrate-and-fire, Winfree, and Kuramoto-Daido type) is performed in the weak-coupling limit for a fully connected network of identical units. An almost perfect agreement is found, with only tiny differences among the models. We also show that the regime of self-consistent partial synchronization [SCPS] is rather general and can be observed for arbitrarily small coupling strength in any model class. As a by-product of our study, we are able to show that an integrate-and-fire model with a generic pulse shape can be always transformed into a similar model with -pulses and a suitable phase response curve.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
