Exploring genetic variation in the tomato (Solanum section Lycopersicon) clade by whole-genome sequencing
Saulo A. Aflitos, Elio Schijlen, Richard Finkers, Sandra Smit, Jun, Wang, Gengyun Zhang, Ning Li, Likai Mao, Hans de Jong, Freek Bakker, Barbara, Gravendeel, Timo Breit, Rob Dirks, Henk Huits, Darush Struss, Ruth Wagner,, Hans van Leeuwen, Roeland van Ham, Laia Fito

TL;DR
This study used whole-genome sequencing of 84 tomato accessions and wild relatives to analyze genetic diversity, identify specific polymorphisms, and resolve phylogenetic relationships, revealing low diversity in cultivated tomatoes and highlighting the importance of multiple reference genomes.
Contribution
It provides new reference genomes and comprehensive comparative analyses, demonstrating the extent of genetic erosion in cultivated tomatoes and the utility of whole-genome SNP data for phylogenetics.
Findings
Genetic diversity in crop tomatoes is extremely low compared to wild species.
Whole-genome SNP data effectively resolves phylogenetic relationships within the Lycopersicon clade.
Identified group- and species-specific polymorphisms linked to fruit traits and growth habits.
Abstract
Genetic variation in the tomato clade was explored by sequencing a selection of 84 tomato accessions and related wild species representative for the Lycopersicon, Arcanum, Eriopersicon, and Neolycopersicon groups. We present a reconstruction of three new reference genomes in support of our comparative genome analyses. Sequence diversity in commercial breeding lines appears extremely low, indicating the dramatic genetic erosion of crop tomatoes. This is reflected by the SNP count in wild species which can exceed 10 million i.e. 20 fold higher than in crop accessions. Comparative sequence alignment reveals group, species, and accession specific polymorphisms, which explain characteristic fruit traits and growth habits in tomato accessions. Using gene models from the annotated Heinz reference genome, we observe a bias in dN/dS ratio in fruit and growth diversification genes compared to a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
