PFA and precipitousness of the nonstationary ideal
Boban Velickovic

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the Proper Forcing Axiom (PFA) does not necessarily lead to the precipitousness of the nonstationary ideal on , using Neeman's forcing with side conditions.
Contribution
It provides a novel application of Neeman's forcing method to separate PFA from the precipitousness of the nonstationary ideal.
Findings
PFA does not imply precipitousness of the nonstationary ideal on
Neeman's forcing with side conditions is effective in this separation
The result clarifies the relationship between forcing axioms and ideal properties
Abstract
We apply Neeman's method of forcing with side conditions to show that PFA does not imply the precipitousness of the nonstationary ideal on .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
