The choice: evaluating and selecting scientific proposals

TL;DR

This paper discusses the importance of proposal evaluation and selection in scientific progress, analyzing traditional merit-based methods and exploring criteria for optimal decision-making to enhance innovation and resource allocation.

Contribution

It provides an analysis of the proposal selection process and suggests criteria for improving the effectiveness of evaluation methods.

Findings

Highlights limitations of expert merit evaluation

Proposes criteria for optimal proposal selection

Emphasizes importance for scientific and social progress

Abstract

The selection process of proposals is a crucial component of scientific progress and innovations. Limited resources must be allocated in the most effective way to maximise advancements and the production of new knowledge, especially as it is becoming increasingly clear that technological and scientific innovation and creativity is an instrument of economic policy and social development. The traditional approach based on merit evaluation by experts has been the preferred method, but there is an issue regarding to what extent such a method can also be an instrument of effective policy. This paper discuss some of the basic processes involved in the evaluation and selection of proposals, indicating some criterion for an optimal solution.