Systematic study of charged-pion and kaon femtoscopy in Au$+$Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}$=200 GeV
A. Adare, S. Afanasiev, C. Aidala, N.N. Ajitanand, Y. Akiba, H., Al-Bataineh, J. Alexander, M. Alfred, K. Aoki, N. Apadula, Y. Aramaki, H., Asano, E.T. Atomssa, R. Averbeck, T.C. Awes, B. Azmoun, V. Babintsev, M. Bai,, G. Baksay, L. Baksay, N.S. Bandara, B. Bannier, K.N. Barish

TL;DR
This study systematically analyzes charged pion and kaon femtoscopy in high-energy gold-gold collisions, revealing differences in source sizes and azimuthal oscillations, with hydrodynamic models partially explaining the observations.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of pion and kaon femtoscopy, highlighting differences in source radii and azimuthal oscillations in heavy-ion collisions.
Findings
Kaon source radii are larger than pion radii in certain directions.
Oscillations of source radii are observed for both pions and kaons.
Hydrodynamic models qualitatively reproduce the oscillations but not their full mass dependence.
Abstract
We present a systematic study of charged pion and kaon interferometry in AuAu collisions at =200 GeV. The kaon mean source radii are found to be larger than pion radii in the outward and longitudinal directions for the same transverse mass; this difference increases for more central collisions. The azimuthal-angle dependence of the radii was measured with respect to the second-order event plane and similar oscillations of the source radii were found for pions and kaons. Hydrodynamic models qualitatively describe the similar oscillations of the mean source radii for pions and kaons, but they do not fully describe the transverse-mass dependence of the oscillations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
