Complexity of Suffix-Free Regular Languages
Janusz Brzozowski, Marek Szyku{\l}a

TL;DR
This paper investigates the complexity properties of suffix-free regular languages, demonstrating the absence of a most complex stream in this class and providing specific streams that meet various complexity bounds.
Contribution
It proves that no single most complex stream exists for suffix-free languages and constructs specific streams that achieve multiple known complexity bounds.
Findings
No most complex stream exists in suffix-free languages.
Constructed ternary stream meets bounds for product, star, and boolean operations.
Constructed quinary stream meets bounds for boolean operations, reversal, and syntactic semigroup size.
Abstract
We study various complexity properties of suffix-free regular languages. The quotient complexity of a regular language is the number of left quotients of ; this is the same as the state complexity of . A regular language is a dialect of a regular language if it differs only slightly from . The quotient complexity of an operation on regular languages is the maximal quotient complexity of the result of the operation expressed as a function of the quotient complexities of the operands. A sequence of regular languages in some class , where is the quotient complexity of , is called a stream. A stream is most complex in class if its languages meet the complexity upper bounds for all basic measures. It is known that there exist such most complex streams in the class of regular languages, in the class of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Coding theory and cryptography · Multilingual Education and Policy
