Thermodynamic work from operational principles
R. Gallego, J. Eisert, H. Wilming

TL;DR
This paper develops a general, axiomatic framework for defining and quantifying work in quantum thermodynamics, extending beyond traditional models and deriving fundamental thermodynamic principles from operational assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to defining work as a resource quantifier through operational axioms, avoiding primitive definitions and deriving key thermodynamic laws.
Findings
Derives a quantitative second law bounding work extraction from non-equilibrium resources.
Establishes a formal connection between reversibility, correlations, and the second law.
Recovers the classical energy-based notion of work as a special case within the formalism.
Abstract
In recent years we have witnessed a concentrated effort to make sense of thermodynamics for small-scale systems. One of the main difficulties is to capture a suitable notion of work that models realistically the purpose of quantum machines, in an analogous way to the role played, for macroscopic machines, by the energy stored in the idealisation of a lifted weight. Despite of several attempts to resolve this issue by putting forward specific models, these are far from capturing realistically the transitions that a quantum machine is expected to perform. In this work, we adopt a novel strategy by considering arbitrary kinds of systems that one can attach to a quantum thermal machine and seeking for work quantifiers. These are functions that measure the value of a transition and generalise the concept of work beyond the model of a lifted weight. We do so by imposing simple operational…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
