Why GPS makes distances bigger than they are

TL;DR

This paper reveals that GPS measurement errors cause a systematic overestimation of distances in movement data, especially at high sampling frequencies, and introduces a method to assess data quality based on error autocorrelation.

Contribution

It provides a mathematical explanation for the overestimation bias and introduces a novel approach to measure error autocorrelation in high-frequency GPS data.

Findings

GPS measurement error causes systematic distance overestimation.

Error autocorrelation can be used as a quality measure for GPS data.

Autocorrelation of errors is significant in real-world trajectories.

Abstract

Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), such as the Global Positioning System (GPS), are among the most important sensors for movement analysis. GPS is widely used to record the trajectories of vehicles, animals and human beings. However, all GPS movement data are affected by both measurement and interpolation error. In this article we show that measurement error causes a systematic bias in distances recorded with a GPS: the distance between two points recorded with a GPS is -- on average -- bigger than the true distance between these points. This systematic `overestimation of distance' becomes relevant if the influence of interpolation error can be neglected, which is the case for movement sampled at high frequencies. We provide a mathematical explanation of this phenomenon and we illustrate that it functionally depends on the autocorrelation of GPS measurement error ($C$). We argue that $C$ can be interpreted as a quality measure for movement data recorded with a GPS. If there is strong autocorrelation any two consecutive position estimates have very similar error. This error cancels out when average speed, distance or direction are calculated along the trajectory. Based on our theoretical findings we introduce a novel approach to determine $C$ in real-world GPS movement data sampled at high frequencies. We apply our approach to a set of pedestrian and a set of car trajectories. We find that the measurement error in the data is strongly spatially and temporally autocorrelated and give a quality estimate of the data. Finally, we want to emphasize that all our findings are not limited to GPS alone. The systematic bias and all its implications are bound to occur in any movement data collected with absolute positioning if interpolation error can be neglected.