Impact of weak interactions of free nucleons on the r-process in dynamical ejecta from neutron-star mergers
Stephane Goriely (1), Andreas Bauswein (2), Oliver Just (3,4), Else, Pllumbi (3,5), and Hans-Thomas Janka (3) ((1) ULB Brussels, (2) Univ., Thessaloniki, (3) MPI Astrophysics, Garching, (4) Max Planck/Princeton Center, for Plasma Physics, (5) Physik Dept., TUM, Garching)

TL;DR
This study examines how weak interactions of free nucleons influence the electron fraction and r-process nucleosynthesis in neutron-star merger ejecta, highlighting the importance of neutrino physics in modeling these astrophysical events.
Contribution
It introduces a parameterized approach to neutrino interactions in BNSM ejecta, assessing their impact on nucleosynthesis and electron fraction without full neutrino transport modeling.
Findings
Neutrino interactions can raise Y_e to 0.25-0.40, enabling successful r-process nucleosynthesis.
Large neutrino luminosities can increase Y_e above 0.40, reducing r-process yields but still matching solar abundance patterns.
Proper neutrino physics is essential for accurate modeling of kilonovae and nucleosynthesis in neutron-star mergers.
Abstract
We investigate beta-interactions of free nucleons and their impact on the electron fraction (Y_e) and r-process nucleosynthesis in ejecta characteristic of binary neutron star mergers (BNSMs). For that we employ trajectories from a relativistic BNSM model to represent the density-temperature evolutions in our parametric study. In the high-density environment, positron captures decrease the neutron richness at the high temperatures predicted by the hydrodynamic simulation. Circumventing the complexities of modelling three-dimensional neutrino transport, (anti)neutrino captures are parameterized in terms of prescribed neutrino luminosities and mean energies, guided by published results and assumed as constant in time. Depending sensitively on the adopted neutrino-antineutrino luminosity ratio, neutrino processes increase Y_e to values between 0.25 and 0.40, still allowing for a successful…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
