Validation of observations obtained with a liquid mirror telescope by comparison with Sloan Digital Sky Survey observations
E. F. Borra

TL;DR
This study validates the reliability of low-resolution spectra obtained from a liquid mirror telescope by comparing its data with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, confirming its usefulness for astronomical surveys.
Contribution
It provides a validation of liquid mirror telescope observations through comparison with SDSS data, demonstrating their reliability for astronomical research.
Findings
Less than 0.3% of spectra were misclassified as peculiar
Liquid mirror telescope data are comparable to classical telescope data
Validation supports use of LMTs in time-domain surveys
Abstract
The results of a search for peculiar astronomical objects using very low resolution spectra obtained with the NASA Orbital Debris Observatory (NODO) 3 meter diameter liquid mirror telescope (LMT) are compared with results of spectra obtained with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). The main purpose of this comparison is to verify whether observations taken with this novel type of telescope are reliable. This comparison is important because LMTs are a novel type of inexpensive telescope that are very useful for astronomical surveys, particularly surveys in the time domain, and a validation of data taken with an LMT, by comparison with data from a classical telescope, will validate their reliability. We start from a published data analysis that classified only 206 of the 18,000 astronomical objects observed with the NODO liquid mirror telescope as peculiar. A total of 29 of these 206…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
