Steepest-entropy-ascent quantum thermodynamic framework for describing the non-equilibrium behavior of a chemically reactive system at an atomistic level
Gian Paolo Beretta, Michael von Spakovsky

TL;DR
This paper develops a quantum thermodynamic framework using Steepest-Entropy-Ascent principles to predict the non-equilibrium behavior and reaction kinetics of a chemically reactive atomistic system, specifically a hydrogen-fluorine mixture.
Contribution
It introduces a general mathematical framework for non-equilibrium atomistic systems, capable of predicting reaction evolution and relaxation without relying on near-equilibrium assumptions.
Findings
The framework accurately predicts the time evolution of the reactive system.
Analytical solutions for energy and particle eigenvalues were obtained.
Comparison with standard kinetic models shows good agreement.
Abstract
Steepest-Entropy-Ascent Quantum Thermodynamics (SEAQT) provides a general framework for the description of non-equilibrium phenomena at any level, particularly the atomistic one. This theory and its dynamical postulate are used here to develop a general mathematical framework, which at an atomistic level, in particular, can be used to predict the non-equilibrium evolution in state of a closed, chemically reactive mixture such as the one examined here, i.e., a mixture of hydrogen (H2) and flourine (F) contained in an isolated tank of fixed volume. The general framework provided, however, is written for a reactive system subject to multiple reaction mechanisms. To predict this evolution in state, both the energy and particle number eigenvalue problems for a dilute gas are set up and solved analytically. Wall and non-ideal-gas behavior effects are neglected, although the extension to dense…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
