Cosmological parameter inference from galaxy clustering: The effect of the posterior distribution of the power spectrum
Benedict Bahr-Kalus, Will J. Percival, Lado Samushia

TL;DR
This paper examines how the choice of posterior distribution shape affects cosmological parameter inference from galaxy survey power spectra, highlighting potential biases and proposing more efficient modeling approaches.
Contribution
It demonstrates that Gaussian posteriors can bias parameter estimates and introduces alternative posterior forms that reduce computational complexity.
Findings
Gaussian posteriors underestimate $f_{NL}$ by 0.4 for Euclid-like data.
Underestimation of $f_{NL}$ is 19.1 for SDSS-III DR9 data.
Alternative posterior forms absorb covariance dependence, simplifying analysis.
Abstract
We consider the shape of the posterior distribution to be used when fitting cosmological models to power spectra measured from galaxy surveys. At very large scales, Gaussian posterior distributions in the power do not approximate the posterior distribution we expect for a Gaussian density field , even if we vary the covariance matrix according to the model to be tested. We compare alternative posterior distributions with , both mode-by-mode and in terms of expected measurements of primordial non-Gaussianity parameterised by . Marginalising over a Gaussian posterior distribution with fixed covariance matrix yields a posterior mean value of which, for a data set with the characteristics of Euclid, will be underestimated by , while for the data release 9 (DR9) of the Sloan…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
