New Constraints on the Star Formation History of the Star Cluster NGC 1856
Matteo Correnti (1), Paul Goudfrooij (1), Thomas H. Puzia (2), Selma, E. de Mink (3) ((1) STScI, (2) P. Univ. Catolica de Chile, (3) Univ. of, Amsterdam)

TL;DR
This study uses Hubble Space Telescope data and simulations to investigate the star formation history of NGC 1856, suggesting an age spread and potential multiple stellar populations, challenging previous claims of a single-age population.
Contribution
It provides new constraints on the age distribution and formation history of NGC 1856, incorporating dynamical models and addressing the role of stellar rotation.
Findings
The CMD is best explained by two stellar populations separated by 80 Myr.
The cluster's escape velocity was sufficient to retain stellar ejecta for ~100 Myr.
Results support an age spread in NGC 1856, contradicting earlier single-age assumptions.
Abstract
We use the Wide Field Camera 3 onboard the Hubble Space Telescope to obtain deep, high-resolution photometry of the young (age ~ 300 Myr) star cluster NGC1856 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. We compare the observed colour-magnitude diagram (CMD), after having applied a correction for differential reddening, with Monte Carlo simulations of simple stellar populations (SSPs) of various ages. We find that the main sequence turn-off (MSTO) region is wider than that derived from the simulation of a single SSP. Using constraints based on the distribution of stars in the MSTO region and the red clump, we find that the CMD is best reproduced using a combination of two different SSPs with ages separated by 80 Myr (0.30 and 0.38 Gyr, respectively). However, we can not formally exclude that the width of the MSTO could be due to a range of stellar rotation velocities if the efficiency of rotational…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
