Modified Gravity and Large Scale Flows
Jeremy Mould, Matthew Colless, Pirin Erdogdu, Heath Jones, John Lucey,, Yin-Zhe Ma, Christina Magoulas, Christopher M Springob

TL;DR
This paper compares standard gravity and MONDian gravity in explaining large-scale cosmic flows, introducing a new diagnostic to test their consistency with observed velocity fields, and finds that MONDian gravity does not match observations.
Contribution
It introduces the velocity angular correlation function as a scale-independent diagnostic for peculiar velocity fields and assesses the compatibility of modified gravity with large-scale structure data.
Findings
Standard gravity aligns with observed velocities
MONDian gravity does not match large-scale flow data
Modified gravity would need to decay faster than r^-1 at large distances
Abstract
Reconstruction of the local velocity field from the overdensity field and a gravitational acceleration that falls off from a point mass as r^-2 yields velocities in broad agreement with peculiar velocities measured with galaxy distance indicators. MONDian gravity does not. To quantify this, we introduce the velocity angular correlation function as a diagnostic of peculiar velocity field alignment and coherence as a function of scale. It is independent of the bias parameter of structure formation in the standard model of cosmology and the acceleration parameter of MOND. A modified gravity acceleration consistent with observed large scale structure would need to asymptote to zero at large distances more like r^-2, than r^-1.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeophysics and Gravity Measurements · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Computational Physics and Python Applications
