DNR and incomparable Turing degrees
Mingzhong Cai, Noam Greenberg, Michael McInerney

TL;DR
This paper constructs a specific sequence of Turing degrees demonstrating that the DNR principle in reverse mathematics does not guarantee the existence of Turing incomparable degrees, revealing limitations in the logical implications of DNR.
Contribution
It introduces a novel construction of an increasing sequence of Turing degrees with specific noncomputability properties, showing a new separation in reverse mathematics.
Findings
Constructs an increasing sequence of Turing degrees with specific properties.
Shows DNR does not imply the existence of Turing incomparable degrees.
Provides a counterexample in reverse mathematics.
Abstract
We construct an increasing -sequence of Turing degrees which forms an initial segment of the Turing degrees, and such that each~ is diagonally noncomputable relative to . It follows that the~ principle of reverse mathematics does not imply the existence of Turing incomparable degrees.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Cellular Automata and Applications · Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
