Measurement of the proton form factor by studying $e^{+} e^{-}\rightarrow p\bar{p}$
M. Ablikim, M. N. Achasov, X. C. Ai, O. Albayrak, M. Albrecht, D. J., Ambrose, A. Amoroso, F. F. An, Q. An, J. Z. Bai, R. Baldini Ferroli, Y. Ban,, D. W. Bennett, J. V. Bennett, M. Bertani, D. Bettoni, J. M. Bian, F. Bianchi,, E. Boger, O. Bondarenko, I. Boyko, R. A. Briere

TL;DR
This study measures the proton's electromagnetic form factors through $e^{+}e^{-} ightarrow par{p}$ collisions at various energies, providing more precise data that supports the assumption $|G_{E}|=|G_{M}|$ and aligns with recent BaBar results.
Contribution
First measurement of the proton form factor via $e^{+}e^{-} ightarrow par{p}$ at multiple energies with improved precision, confirming the ratio $|G_{E}/G_{M}|$ near unity.
Findings
Measured cross sections agree with BaBar results, reducing uncertainty by 30%.
The ratio $|G_{E}/G_{M}|$ is close to unity, supporting the assumption $|G_{E}|=|G_{M}|$.
Results are consistent across different energies and with previous experiments.
Abstract
Using data samples collected with the BESIII detector at the BEPCII collider, we measure the Born cross section of at 12 center-of-mass energies from 2232.4 to 3671.0 MeV. The corresponding effective electromagnetic form factor of the proton is deduced under the assumption that the electric and magnetic form factors are equal . In addition, the ratio of electric to magnetic form factors, , and are extracted by fitting the polar angle distribution of the proton for the data samples with larger statistics, namely at 2232.4 and 2400.0 MeV and a combined sample at = 3050.0, 3060.0 and 3080.0 MeV, respectively. The measured cross sections are in agreement with recent results from BaBar, improving the overall uncertainty by about 30\%. The ratios are close to unity and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
