Temperature-based metallicity measurements at z=0.8: direct calibration of strong-line diagnostics at intermediate redshift
Tucker Jones, Crystal Martin, Michael C. Cooper

TL;DR
This study calibrates strong-line metallicity diagnostics at z=0.8 using direct electron temperature measurements, finding minimal evolution compared to local universe and supporting their application at higher redshifts.
Contribution
First direct calibration of metallicity diagnostics at intermediate redshift using electron temperature measurements, confirming their reliability across cosmic time.
Findings
No significant evolution in line ratios between z=0.8 and z=0.
Physical conditions of HII regions remain consistent at fixed oxygen abundance.
Nitrogen-based diagnostics may have systematic errors at high redshift.
Abstract
We present the first direct calibration of strong-line metallicity diagnostics at significant cosmological distances using a sample at z=0.8 drawn from the DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey. Oxygen and neon abundances are derived from measurements of electron temperature and density. We directly compare various commonly used relations between gas-phase metallicity and strong line ratios of O, Ne, and H at z=0.8 and z=0. There is no evolution with redshift at high precision (, ). O, Ne, and H line ratios follow the same locus at z=0.8 as at z=0 with 0.02 dex evolution and low scatter (0.04 dex). This suggests little or no evolution in physical conditions of HII regions at fixed oxygen abundance, in contrast to models which invoke more extreme properties at high redshifts. We speculate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
