
TL;DR
This paper formalizes the initial parts of the theory of parity complexes in Coq, verifying complex recursive algorithms and definitions that underpin the construction of free ω-categories from combinatorial structures.
Contribution
It provides a formal Coq implementation of parity complexes up to the excision of extremals, ensuring correctness and clarifying which parts require complex proofs.
Findings
Formal verification of all cases in the theory
Identification of parts requiring complex proofs
Insights into future research directions
Abstract
We formalise, in Coq, the opening sections of Parity Complexes [Street1991] up to and including the all important excision of extremals algorithm. Parity complexes describe the essential combinatorial structure exhibited by simplexes, cubes and globes, that enable the construction of free -categories on such objects. The excision of extremals is a recursive algorithm that presents every cell in such a category as a (unique) composite of atomic cells. This is the sense in which the -category is (freely) generated from its atoms. Due to the complicated multi-dimensional nature of this work, the detail of definitions and proofs can be hard to follow and verify. Indeed, some corrections were required some years following the original publication~\cite{Street1994}. Our formalisation verifies that all cases of each result operate as stated. In particular, we indicate which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
