Arecibo Pulsar Survey Using ALFA. IV. Mock Spectrometer Data Analysis, Survey Sensitivity, and the Discovery of 41 Pulsars
P. Lazarus, A. Brazier, J. W. T. Hessels, C. Karako-Argaman, V. M., Kaspi, R. Lynch, E. Madsen, C. Patel, S. M. Ransom, P. Scholz, J. Swiggum, W., W. Zhu, B. Allen, S. Bogdanov, F. Camilo, F. Cardoso, S. Chatterjee, J. M., Cordes, F. Crawford, J. S. Deneva, R. Ferdman

TL;DR
This paper details the PALFA survey's recent advancements in data analysis, resulting in the discovery of 41 new pulsars, and provides a comprehensive assessment of the survey's sensitivity, highlighting the impact of red noise on long-period pulsar detection.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new data reduction pipeline and provides an in-depth analysis of survey sensitivity, including the effects of interference and red noise, and reports the discovery of 41 pulsars.
Findings
Discovered 41 new pulsars, including 8 MSPs.
Confirmed survey sensitivity aligns with theoretical models for MSPs.
Red noise causes up to 10-fold sensitivity loss for long-period pulsars.
Abstract
The on-going PALFA survey at the Arecibo Observatory began in 2004 and is searching for radio pulsars in the Galactic plane at 1.4 GHz. Observations since 2009 have been made with new wider-bandwidth spectrometers than were previously employed in this survey. A new data reduction pipeline has been in place since mid-2011 which consists of standard methods using dedispersion, searches for accelerated periodic sources, and search for single pulses, as well as new interference-excision strategies and candidate selection heuristics. This pipeline has been used to discover 41 pulsars, including 8 millisecond pulsars (MSPs; P < 10 ms), bringing the PALFA survey's discovery totals to 145 pulsars, including 17 MSPs, and one Fast Radio Burst (FRB). The pipeline presented here has also re-detected 188 previously known pulsars including 60 found in PALFA data by re-analyzing observations…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
