`local' vs. `global' parameters -- breaking the gaussian complexity barrier
Shahar Mendelson

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that for convex, subgaussian function classes, the learning error rate is governed by local covering estimates instead of traditional gaussian averages, providing sharper bounds.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach linking error rates to local covering estimates, breaking the previous gaussian complexity barrier in learning theory.
Findings
Error rate determined by local covering estimates
Established sharp upper and lower bounds
Breaks the gaussian complexity barrier
Abstract
We show that if is a convex class of functions that is -subgaussian, the error rate of learning problems generated by independent noise is equivalent to a fixed point determined by `local' covering estimates of the class, rather than by the gaussian averages. To that end, we establish new sharp upper and lower estimates on the error rate for such problems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
