Unveiling the population of orphan Gamma Ray Bursts
G. Ghirlanda, R. Salvaterra, S. Campana, S. D. Vergani, J. Japelj, M., G. Bernardini, D. Burlon, P. D'Avanzo, A. Melandri, A. Gomboc, F. Nappo, R., Paladini, A. Pescalli, O. S. Salafia, G. Tagliaferri

TL;DR
This paper models the expected population and detection rates of orphan gamma-ray burst afterglows across multiple wavelengths, highlighting their potential observability with current and upcoming surveys.
Contribution
It introduces a population synthesis model to estimate the flux and detection rates of orphan afterglows in mm, optical, and X-ray bands, providing new predictions for observational campaigns.
Findings
Approximately 2 orphan afterglows per year could be detected by Gaia.
Up to 20 orphan afterglows per year could be observed by ZTF.
LSST could detect around 50 orphan afterglows annually.
Abstract
Gamma Ray Bursts are detectable in the gamma-ray band if their jets are oriented towards the observer. However, for each GRB with a typical theta_jet, there should be ~2/theta_jet^2 bursts whose emission cone is oriented elsewhere in space. These off-axis bursts can be eventually detected when, due to the deceleration of their relativistic jets, the beaming angle becomes comparable to the viewing angle. Orphan Afterglows (OA) should outnumber the current population of bursts detected in the gamma-ray band even if they have not been conclusively observed so far at any frequency. We compute the expected flux of the population of orphan afterglows in the mm, optical and X-ray bands through a population synthesis code of GRBs and the standard afterglow emission model. We estimate the detection rate of OA by on-going and forthcoming surveys. The average duration of OA as transients above a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
