On the proper kinetic quadrupole CMB removal and the quadrupole anomalies
Alessio Notari, Miguel Quartin

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of correctly accounting for the frequency-dependent kinetic Doppler quadrupole in CMB data analysis, which significantly impacts the statistical significance of quadrupole anomalies and improves consistency across different maps.
Contribution
It introduces a method to properly include the frequency dependence of the Doppler quadrupole correction in CMB data, refining the analysis of quadrupole anomalies.
Findings
Frequency-dependent DQ correction varies between 1.67 and 2.47 times the simple estimate.
Correct DQ removal increases the quadrupole alignment significance from 2.3σ to 3.3σ.
Proper correction improves consistency across different CMB map reconstructions.
Abstract
It has been pointed out recently that the quadrupole-octopole alignment in the CMB data is significantly affected by the so-called kinetic Doppler quadrupole (DQ), which is the temperature quadrupole induced by our proper motion. Assuming our velocity is the dominant contribution to the CMB dipole we have v/c = beta = (1.231 +/- 0.003) * 10^{-3}, which leads to a non-negligible DQ of order beta^2. Here we stress that one should properly take into account that CMB data are usually not presented in true thermodynamic temperature, which induces a frequency dependent boost correction. The DQ must therefore be multiplied by a frequency-averaged factor, which we explicitly compute for several CMB maps finding that it varies between 1.67 and 2.47. This is often neglected in the literature and turns out to cause a small but non-negligible difference in the significance levels of some…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
