A Framework for Understanding the Patterns of Student Reasoning Difficulties in Quantum Mechanics
Emily Marshman, Chandralekha Singh

TL;DR
This paper presents a framework comparing student reasoning difficulties in quantum mechanics to those in classical mechanics, highlighting parallels to improve teaching strategies for developing expertise.
Contribution
It introduces a novel framework that links student difficulties in quantum mechanics to those in classical mechanics, guiding educational tool development.
Findings
Student reasoning difficulties in quantum mechanics resemble those in classical mechanics.
The framework incorporates students' prior preparation, goals, and motivation.
Leveraging classical mechanics research can inform quantum mechanics education.
Abstract
Compared with introductory physics, relatively little is known about the development of expertise in advanced physics courses, especially in the case of quantum mechanics. Here, we describe a framework for understanding the patterns of student reasoning difficulties and how students develop expertise in quantum mechanics. The framework posits that the challenges many students face in developing expertise in quantum mechanics are analogous to the challenges introductory students face in developing expertise in introductory classical mechanics. This framework incorporates both the diversity in upper-level students' prior preparation, goals, and motivation in general (i.e., the facts that even in upper-level courses, students may be inadequately prepared, have unclear goals, and have insufficient motivation to excel) as well as the "paradigm shift" from classical mechanics to quantum…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
