Notes on orbit and spin tracking in an electrostatic storage ring
S. R. Mane

TL;DR
This paper critically examines recent claims about a numerical integration algorithm for electrostatic storage rings, questioning whether the proposed orbit tracking method is truly symplectic, especially regarding zero-length elements.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis of the symplectic nature of the orbit tracking algorithm in recent literature, highlighting potential inaccuracies in its claims.
Findings
The orbit tracking algorithm may not be symplectic for zero-length elements.
Questions the validity of claims made in recent arXiv papers.
Highlights the importance of symplecticity in accurate beam dynamics simulations.
Abstract
Two documents have recently been posted on the arXiv describing a numerical integration algorithm: "symplectic orbit/spin tracking code for all-electric storage rings" [1] and some computational results therefrom [2]. This note comments critically on some of the claims in [1] and [2]. In particular, it is not clear that the orbit tracking algorithm described in [1] is really symplectic. Specifically, for electrostatic beamline elements, the so-called "zero length elements," which are treated as position dependent kicks in the formalism in [1], are in fact {\em not} symplectic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers · Particle accelerators and beam dynamics · Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
