Calibrating the {\alpha} parameter of convective efficiency using observed stellar properties
X.S. Wu, S. Alexeeva, L. Mashonkina, L. Wang, G. Zhao, F. Grupp

TL;DR
This study calibrates the convective efficiency parameter in 1D stellar atmosphere models using Balmer-line and SED observations of the Sun and Procyon, finding values that align with 3D models for main sequence stars but indicating a more rapid decrease in efficiency for evolved stars.
Contribution
It provides an empirical calibration of the convective efficiency parameter { extalpha} across different stellar evolutionary stages, improving the accuracy of 1D stellar atmosphere models.
Findings
Convective efficiency parameter { extalpha} is about 2.0 for main sequence stars.
{ extalpha} decreases to approximately 1.0 for evolved stars.
Results align with 3D model predictions for main sequence stars, but show more rapid decline in giants.
Abstract
Context. Synthetic model atmosphere calculations are still the most commonly used tool when determining precise stellar parameters and stellar chemical compositions. Besides three-dimensional models that consistently solve for hydrodynamic processes, one-dimensional models that use an approximation for convective energy transport play the major role. Aims. We use modern Balmer-line formation theory as well as spectral energy distribution (SED) measurements for the Sun and Procyon to calibrate the model parameter {\alpha} that describes the efficiency of convection in our 1D models. Convection was calibrated over a significant range in parameter space, reaching from F-K along the main sequence and sampling the turnoff and giant branch over a wide range of metallicities. This calibration was compared to theoretical evaluations and allowed an accurate modeling of stellar atmospheres.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
