Search for Resonances Decaying to Top and Bottom Quarks with the CDF Experiment
CDF Collaboration: T. Aaltonen, S. Amerio, D. Amidei, A. Anastassov,, A. Annovi, J. Antos, F. Anza', G. Apollinari, J.A. Appel, T. Arisawa, A., Artikov, J. Asaadi, W. Ashmanskas, B. Auerbach, A. Aurisano, F. Azfar, W., Badgett, T. Bae, A. Barbaro-Galtieri, V.E. Barnes

TL;DR
This paper searches for heavy charged resonances decaying to top and bottom quarks using the full Tevatron dataset, setting new limits on their production cross section and constraining the $W'$ boson mass and couplings.
Contribution
It provides the most stringent limits to date on charged resonances decaying to top and bottom quarks in the 300-600 GeV/$c^2$ range, using the full CDF II dataset.
Findings
No significant excess above the SM background was observed.
Set 95% Bayesian upper limits on production cross section times branching ratio.
Constrained $W'$ boson mass and couplings in the 300-900 GeV/$c^2$ range.
Abstract
We report on a search for charged massive resonances decaying to top () and bottom () quarks in the full data set of proton-antiproton collisions at center-of-mass energy of TeV collected by the CDF~II detector at the Tevatron, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9.5 . No significant excess above the standard model (SM) background prediction is observed. We set 95% Bayesian credibility mass-dependent upper limits on the heavy charged particle production cross section times branching ratio to . Using a SM extension with a and left-right-symmetric couplings as a benchmark model, we constrain the mass and couplings in the 300 to 900 GeV/ range. The limits presented here are the most stringent for a charged resonance with mass in the range 300 -- 600 GeV/ decaying to top and bottom quarks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
