Comment on "Asymptotic Phase for Stochastic Oscillators"
Peter J. Thomas, Benjamin Lindner

TL;DR
This paper critiques two methods for defining the phase of stochastic oscillators, demonstrating that neither can reliably identify a unique phase when multiple oscillations coexist within the same system.
Contribution
It clarifies the limitations of existing phase definitions for stochastic oscillators in complex systems with multiple oscillations.
Findings
Neither method unambiguously identifies a unique system of isochrons.
Multiple oscillations coexist, complicating phase determination.
Current methods are insufficient for systems with multiple oscillatory modes.
Abstract
In his Comment [arXiv:1501.02126 (2015)] on our recent paper [Phys. Rev. Lett., v. 113, 254101 (2014)], Pikovsky compares two methods for defining the "phase" of a stochastic oscillator. We reply to his Comment by showing that neither method can unambiguously identify a unique system of isochrons, when multiple oscillations coexist in the same system.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Neural dynamics and brain function
