The energy budget of GRBs based on updated prompt \& afterglow observations
Nahliel Wygoda, Dafne Guetta, Marc-Adrien Mandich, Eli Waxman

TL;DR
This study compares gamma-ray and fireball energies in 91 GRBs, finding a tight correlation and small variations, which suggest consistent energy conversion efficiency and limited energy modification during afterglow phases.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive comparison of gamma-ray and afterglow energies in a large GRB sample, revealing small burst-to-burst variations and implications for jet angles.
Findings
E_gamma and E_fb are tightly correlated.
Burst-to-burst variations in efficiency are small.
Jet opening angles are generally greater than 0.1 radians.
Abstract
We compare the isotropic equivalent 15-2000 keV gamma-ray energy, E_gamma, emitted by a sample of 91 swift Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) with known redshifts, with the isotropic equivalent fireball energy, E_fb, as estimated within the fireball model framework from X-ray afterglow observations of these bursts. The uncertainty in E_gamma, which spans the range of ~10^51 erg to ~10^53.5 erg, is approximately 25% on average, due mainly to the extrapolation from the BAT detector band to the 15-2000 keV band. The uncertainty in E_fb is approximately a factor of 2, due mainly to the X-ray measurements' scatter. We find E_gamma and E_fb to be tightly correlated. The average(std) of {\eta}^11hr_gamma is approximately log_10(E_gamma/(3{\epsilon} _eE^11hr_fb)) are -0.34(0.60), and the upper limit on the intrinsic spread of {\eta}_gamma is approximately 0.5 ({\epsilon}_e is the fraction of shocked…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
