Evolutionarily induced alternative states and coexistence in systems with apparent competition
Sebastian J. Schreiber, Swati Patel

TL;DR
This paper explores how predator evolution influences prey coexistence and community stability, revealing that eco-evolutionary feedbacks can promote or hinder permanence and lead to alternative stable states.
Contribution
It introduces a mathematical framework combining quantitative genetics and Lotka-Volterra models to analyze eco-evolutionary dynamics in predator-prey systems.
Findings
Eco-evolutionary feedbacks can promote permanence at intermediate attack rate trade-offs.
Strong trade-offs can lead to loss of permanence but still support coexistence.
Alternative stable states depend on evolutionary trade-offs and feedbacks.
Abstract
Predators often consume multiple prey and by mutually subsidizing a shared predator, the prey may reciprocally harm each other. When predation levels are high, this apparent competition can culminate in a prey species being displaced. Coupling quantitative genetics and Lotka-Volterra models, we study how predator evolution alters this and other ecological outcomes. These models account for a trade-off between the predator's attack rates on two prey species. We provide a mathematical characterization of a strong form of persistence--permanence--for which there is a global attractor bounded away from extinction. When the evolutionary dynamics occur at a sufficiently slower time scale than the ecological dynamics, we also characterize attractors and their basins' of attraction using singular perturbation theory and a graphical approach to the eco-evolutionary dynamics. Our results show…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
