Superconductivity versus structural phase transition in the closely related Bi$_{2} $Rh$ _{3.5}$S$ _{2}$ and Bi$_{2} $Rh$ _{3}$S$ _{2}$
Udhara S. Kaluarachchi, Weiwei Xie, Qisheng Lin, Valentin Taufour,, Sergey L. Bud'ko, Gordon J. Miller, Paul C. Canfield

TL;DR
This study compares the structural and superconducting properties of two related bismuth-rhodium sulfide compounds, revealing a structural phase transition in one and superconductivity in the other, with detailed thermodynamic and transport analyses.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of structural transitions and superconductivity in Bi$_{2}$Rh$_{3}$S$_{2}$ and Bi$_{2}$Rh$_{3.5}$S$_{2}$, highlighting their different behaviors.
Findings
Bi$_{2}$Rh$_{3}$S$_{2}$ exhibits a structural phase transition at 165 K.
Bi$_{2}$Rh$_{3.5}$S$_{2}$ shows bulk superconductivity at 1.7 K.
Bi$_{2}$Rh$_{3.5}$S$_{2}$ is a weakly coupled BCS superconductor.
Abstract
Single crystals of BiRhS and BiRhS were synthesized by solution growth and the crystal structures, thermodynamic and transport properties of both compounds were studied. In the case of BiRhS, a structural first-order transition at around 165 K is identified by single crystal diffraction experiments, with clear signatures visible in resistivity, magnetization and specific heat data. No superconducting transition for BiRhS was observed down to 0.5 K. In contrast, no structural phase transition at high temperature was observed for BiRhS, however bulk superconductivity with a critical temperature, 1.7 K was observed. The Sommerfeld coefficient \ and the Debye temperature() were found to be 9.4 mJ mol K and 209 K…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
