RNF: a general framework to evaluate NGS read mappers
Karel B\v{r}inda, Valentina Boeva, Gregory Kucherov

TL;DR
This paper introduces RNF, a universal format and software framework for evaluating NGS read mappers by encoding read origin information, enabling standardized and flexible assessment of mapping accuracy and parameter effects.
Contribution
The authors developed RNF, a generic read naming format, and an associated software package that simplifies and standardizes the evaluation of NGS read mappers across different simulators.
Findings
RNF enables consistent evaluation of read mappers.
The framework supports analysis of mapping qualities and contamination effects.
It facilitates comparison across different simulation tools.
Abstract
Aligning reads to a reference sequence is a fundamental step in numerous bioinformatics pipelines. As a consequence, the sensitivity and precision of the mapping tool, applied with certain parameters to certain data, can critically affect the accuracy of produced results (e.g., in variant calling applications). Therefore, there has been an increasing demand of methods for comparing mappers and for measuring effects of their parameters. Read simulators combined with alignment evaluation tools provide the most straightforward way to evaluate and compare mappers. Simulation of reads is accompanied by information about their positions in the source genome. This information is then used to evaluate alignments produced by the mapper. Finally, reports containing statistics of successful read alignments are created. In default of standards for encoding read origins, every evaluation tool…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
