Clustering of Local Group distances: publication bias or correlated measurements? III. The Small Magellanic Cloud
Richard de Grijs, Giuseppe Bono

TL;DR
This paper consolidates various distance measurements to the Small Magellanic Cloud, providing a precise mean distance estimate while discussing potential systematic uncertainties due to complex galaxy geometry and measurement methods.
Contribution
It compiles the largest database of SMC distance estimates and derives a refined mean distance with a comprehensive analysis of systematic effects.
Findings
Mean SMC distance of 18.96 mag with formal error 0.02 mag
Systematic uncertainties may exceed 0.15-0.20 mag due to galaxy complexity
Multiple stellar tracers used for distance estimation
Abstract
Aiming at providing a firm mean distance estimate to the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), and thus to place it within the internally consistent Local Group distance framework we recently established, we compiled the current-largest database of published distance estimates to the galaxy. Based on careful statistical analysis, we derive mean distance estimates to the SMC using eclipsing binary systems, variable stars, stellar population tracers, and star cluster properties. Their weighted mean leads to a final recommendation for the mean SMC distance of mag, where the uncertainty represents the formal error. Systematic effects related to lingering uncertainties in extinction corrections, our physical understanding of the stellar tracers used, and the SMC's complex geometry---including its significant line-of-sight depth, its irregular appearance which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
