Geometry of Interaction for MALL via Hughes-vanGlabbeek Proof-Nets
Masahiro Hamano

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel Geometry of Interaction interpretation for MALL using Hughes-vanGlabbeek proof-nets, capturing correctness criteria through algebraic operators and extending Girard's *-algebra to handle additive features.
Contribution
It provides the first GoI model for MALL based on HvG proof-nets, incorporating algebraic scalar extensions and a refined execution formula to analyze feedback and correctness.
Findings
Termination of the execution formula aligns with HvG's toggling criterion.
The model captures boolean valuations, proof pruning, and additive contractions.
Collapse of boolean structure recovers known multiplicative GoI correspondence.
Abstract
This paper presents, for the first time, a Geometry of Interaction (GoI) interpretation inspired from Hughes-vanGlabbeek (HvG) proof-nets for multiplicative additive linear logic (MALL). Our GoI dynamically captures HvG's geometric correctness criterion-the toggling cycle condition-in terms of algebraic operators. Our new ingredient is a scalar extension of the *-algebra in Girard's *-ring of partial isometries over a boolean polynomial ring with literals of eigenweights as indeterminates. In order to capture feedback arising from cuts, we construct a finer grained execution formula. The expansion of this execution formula is longer than that for collections of slices for multiplicative GoI, hence it is harder to prove termination. Our GoI gives a dynamical, semantical account of boolean valuations (in particular, pruning sub-proofs), conversion of weights (in particular,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, programming, and type systems · Formal Methods in Verification · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
