Planck intermediate results. XXVII. High-redshift infrared galaxy overdensity candidates and lensed sources discovered by Planck and confirmed by Herschel-SPIRE
Planck Collaboration: N. Aghanim, B. Altieri, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown,, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, E., Battaner, A. Beelen, K. Benabed, A. Benoit-L\'evy, J.-P. Bernard, M., Bersanelli, M. Bethermin, P. Bielewicz, L. Bonavera, J. R. Bond

TL;DR
This study identifies high-redshift, star-forming galaxy overdensities and lensed sources using Planck and Herschel data, revealing potential protoclusters and confirming the effectiveness of all-sky submm surveys in cosmological structure formation research.
Contribution
First large-scale identification of high-z galaxy overdensities and lensed sources using Planck and Herschel data, demonstrating the potential of all-sky submm maps for cosmological studies.
Findings
94% of SPIRE sources are galaxy overdensities
3% are confirmed lensed systems at z>2.2
Star formation rates reach up to 7000 Msun/yr in overdensities
Abstract
[Abridged] We use the Planck all-sky submm and mm maps to search for rare sources distinguished by extreme brightness, a few hundreds of mJy, and their potential for being situated at high redshift. These "cold" Planck sources, selected using the High Frequency Instrument (HFI) directly from the maps and from the Planck Catalogue of Compact Sources (PCCS), all satisfy the criterion of having their rest-frame far-infrared peak redshifted to the frequency range 353 and 857 GHz. This colour-selection favours galaxies in the redshift range z=2-4, which we consider as cold peaks in the cosmic infrared background (CIB). We perform a dedicated Herschel-SPIRE follow-up of 234 such Planck targets, finding a significant excess of red 350 and 500um sources, in comparison to reference SPIRE fields. About 94% of the SPIRE sources in the Planck fields are consistent with being overdensities of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
