Decoherence in adiabatic quantum computation
Tameem Albash, Daniel A. Lidar

TL;DR
This paper investigates how decoherence affects adiabatic quantum computation and quantum annealing, showing that certain types of decoherence may not hinder success and that boundary cancellation methods remain effective.
Contribution
It demonstrates that decoherence in the energy eigenbasis does not necessarily impair adiabatic quantum algorithms and extends boundary cancellation techniques to open systems.
Findings
Decoherence in the energy eigenbasis can be non-detrimental to adiabatic quantum computation.
Boundary cancellation methods remain effective in open system settings.
A quantum Monte Carlo algorithm can interpolate between classical and quantum annealing.
Abstract
Recent experiments with increasingly larger numbers of qubits have sparked renewed interest in adiabatic quantum computation, and in particular quantum annealing. A central question that is repeatedly asked is whether quantum features of the evolution can survive over the long time-scales used for quantum annealing relative to standard measures of the decoherence time. We reconsider the role of decoherence in adiabatic quantum computation and quantum annealing using the adiabatic quantum master equation formalism. We restrict ourselves to the weak-coupling and singular-coupling limits, which correspond to decoherence in the energy eigenbasis and in the computational basis, respectively. We demonstrate that decoherence in the instantaneous energy eigenbasis does not necessarily detrimentally affect adiabatic quantum computation, and in particular that a short single-qubit time need…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
