A Dempster-Schafer approach to Bell's inequalities
Adam Stokes

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel approach using Dempster-Schafer evidence theory to model EPRB experiments, challenging traditional Bell inequality results by incorporating a different type of epistemic uncertainty.
Contribution
It replaces Kolmogorov probability with Dempster-Schafer theory, providing a new framework that aligns with classical determinism and locality while violating Bell inequalities.
Findings
Dempster-Schafer theory models epistemic uncertainty absent in Kolmogorov theory.
Conditional relative frequencies are compatible with classical determinism.
Bell-type inequalities are not satisfied under this new modeling approach.
Abstract
We present an alternative approach to modeling Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm (EPRB)-type experiments. The basis for our approach will be to replace the conventional Kolmogorov theory of probability, with the more general Dempster-Schafer theory of evidence. This leads to the identification of a distinct type of epistemic uncertainty, which is not present in Kolmogorov theory, but which is relevant in modeling experiments with operationally incompatible observables. Our treatment naturally yields conditional relative frequencies, which are perfectly compatible with classical determinism and locality, but which do not satisfy Bell-type inequalities.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Logic · semigroups and automata theory · Mathematics and Applications
