Reionization after Planck: The Derived Growth of the Cosmic Ionizing Emissivity now matches the Growth of the Galaxy UV Luminosity Density
R. J. Bouwens, G. D. Illingworth, P. A. Oesch, J. Caruana, B., Holwerda, R. Smit, S. Wilkins

TL;DR
This study uses Planck data and galaxy observations to empirically determine the evolution of cosmic ionizing emissivity, strongly supporting the idea that faint star-forming galaxies drove the universe's reionization.
Contribution
It provides a model-independent empirical evolution of ionizing emissivity that aligns with galaxy UV luminosity density, emphasizing galaxies as primary reionization sources.
Findings
Ionizing emissivity evolution is largely independent of source nature.
Galaxy UV luminosity density evolution matches ionizing emissivity trends.
Quasars/AGN do not match the observed emissivity evolution.
Abstract
Thomson optical depth tau measurements from Planck provide new insights into the reionization of the universe. In pursuit of model-independent constraints on the properties of the ionising sources, we determine the empirical evolution of the cosmic ionizing emissivity. We use a simple two-parameter model to map out the evolution in the emissivity at z>~6 from the new Planck optical depth tau measurements, from the constraints provided by quasar absorption spectra and from the prevalence of Ly-alpha emission in z~7-8 galaxies. We find the redshift evolution in the emissivity dot{N}_{ion}(z) required by the observations to be d(log Nion)/dz=-0.15(-0.11)(+0.08), largely independent of the assumed clumping factor C_{HII} and entirely independent of the nature of the ionising sources. The trend in dot{N}_{ion}(z) is well-matched by the evolution of the galaxy UV-luminosity density (dlog_{10}…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
