Galaxy sizes as a function of environment at intermediate redshift from the ESO Distant Cluster Survey

TL;DR

This study compares galaxy sizes in clusters and fields at intermediate redshift (0.4<z<0.8) and finds no significant environmental effect on size, suggesting size evolution mechanisms are environment-independent at these epochs.

Contribution

It provides the first detailed comparison of galaxy size distributions in cluster and field environments at intermediate redshift, showing environment has little impact on galaxy sizes.

Findings

No significant size difference between cluster and field galaxies.

Size differences are less than 10-20%.

Results are consistent across photometric and spectroscopic samples.

Abstract

In order to assess whether the environment has a significant effect on galaxy sizes, we compare the mass--size relations of cluster and field galaxies in the $0.4 < z < 0.8$ redshift range from the ESO Distant Cluster Survey (EDisCS) using HST images. We analyse two mass-selected samples, one defined using photometric redshifts ($10.2 \le \log M_\ast/M_{\odot} \le 12.0$), and a smaller more robust subsample using spectroscopic redshifts ($10.6 \le \log M_\ast/M_{\odot} \le 11.8$). We find no significant difference in the size distributions of cluster and field galaxies of a given morphology. Similarly, we find no significant difference in the size distributions of cluster and field galaxies of similar rest-frame $B-V$ colours. We rule out average size differences larger than $10$--$20$\% in both cases. Consistent conclusions are found with the spectroscopic and photometric samples. These results have important consequences for the physical process(es) responsible for the size evolution of galaxies, and in particular the effect of the environment. The remarkable growth in galaxy size observed from $z\sim2.5$ has been reported to depend on the environment at higher redshifts ($z>1$), with early-type/passive galaxies in higher density environments growing earlier. Such dependence disappears at lower redshifts. Therefore, if the reported difference at higher-$z$ is real, the growth of field galaxies has caught up with that of cluster galaxies by $z\sim1$. Any putative mechanism responsible for galaxy growth has to account for the existence of environmental differences at high redshift and their absence (or weakening) at lower redshifts.