The Difficulty of Getting High Escape Fractions of Ionizing Photons from High-redshift Galaxies: a View from the FIRE Cosmological Simulations
Xiangcheng Ma (1), Daniel Kasen (2,3), Philip F. Hopkins (1),, Claude-Andre Faucher-Giguere (4), Eliot Quataert (2), Dusan Keres (5), Norman, Murray (6) ((1) Caltech, (2) UC Berkeley, (3) LBNL, (4) Northwestern, (5), UCSD, (6) CITA)

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution cosmological simulations to evaluate the escape fraction of ionizing photons from high-redshift galaxies, revealing low average escape fractions and the importance of stellar population age and feedback in photon escape.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of ionizing photon escape fractions from high-redshift galaxies using high-resolution FIRE simulations, highlighting the effects of stellar age, feedback, and sub-grid models.
Findings
Average escape fraction is around 5%, lower than many models.
Escape fraction varies significantly over time, from 0.01% to 20%.
Older stellar populations can boost escape fractions if they produce more ionizing photons.
Abstract
We present a series of high-resolution (20-2000 Msun, 0.1-4 pc) cosmological zoom-in simulations at z~6 from the Feedback In Realistic Environment (FIRE) project. These simulations cover halo masses 10^9-10^11 Msun and rest-frame ultraviolet magnitude Muv = -9 to -19. These simulations include explicit models of the multi-phase ISM, star formation, and stellar feedback, which produce reasonable galaxy properties at z = 0-6. We post-process the snapshots with a radiative transfer code to evaluate the escape fraction (fesc) of hydrogen ionizing photons. We find that the instantaneous fesc has large time variability (0.01%-20%), while the time-averaged fesc over long time-scales generally remains ~5%, considerably lower than the estimate in many reionization models. We find no strong dependence of fesc on galaxy mass or redshift. In our simulations, the intrinsic ionizing photon budgets…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
