Stellar and Planetary Properties of K2 Campaign 1 Candidates and Validation of 17 Planets, Including a Planet Receiving Earth-like Insolation
Benjamin T. Montet, Timothy D. Morton, Daniel Foreman-Mackey, John, Asher Johnson, David W. Hogg, Brendan P. Bowler, David W. Latham, Allyson, Bieryla, Andrew W. Mann

TL;DR
This paper characterizes stellar and planetary properties of K2 Campaign 1 candidates, validating 21 planets including one with Earth-like insolation, and introduces open-source tools for stellar modeling and planet validation.
Contribution
It provides detailed properties for K2 planets, validates 17 for the first time, and develops two new software packages for stellar analysis and planet validation.
Findings
Validated 17 new planets, including one with Earth-like insolation.
Identified 6 candidates as likely false positives.
Presented two open-source software tools for stellar and planetary analysis.
Abstract
The extended Kepler mission, K2, is now providing photometry of new fields every three months in a search for transiting planets. In a recent study, Foreman-Mackey and collaborators presented a list of 36 planet candidates orbiting 31 stars in K2 Campaign 1. In this contribution, we present stellar and planetary properties for all systems. We combine ground-based seeing-limited survey data and adaptive optics imaging with an automated transit analysis scheme to validate 21 candidates as planets, 17 for the first time, and identify 6 candidates as likely false positives. Of particular interest is K2-18 (EPIC 201912552), a bright (K=8.9) M2.8 dwarf hosting a 2.23 \pm 0.25 R_Earth planet with T_eq = 272 \pm 15 K and an orbital period of 33 days. We also present two new open-source software packages which enable this analysis. The first, isochrones, is a flexible tool for fitting…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
