Spectral comparison between AGN at z = 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3
Hartmut Winkler, Jessica Tsuen

TL;DR
This study compares the spectral properties of AGN at three different redshifts to investigate potential evolutionary trends, using a large sample from ROSAT and SDSS data.
Contribution
It provides a spectral comparison across redshifts 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3, accounting for selection biases to assess AGN evolution.
Findings
No significant evolution detected in AGN spectral sub-types with redshift.
Selection biases carefully considered to ensure robust conclusions.
Sample includes 812 sources with detailed spectral classification.
Abstract
We identified three samples of ROSAT sources with Sloan Digital Sky Survey spectra, one at redshift z = 0.1, a second one at z = 0.2 and a third one at z = 0.3. 812 sources in total were examined. We determined the nature and spectral sub-types of the sources by visual inspection. The fraction of each sub-type at each of the three redshifts are then calculated. We consider selection biases caused by the luminosity cut-off threshold to determine whether any systematic trends in AGN type are evident with increasing redshift. We hence probe if an evolution effect is detected in our sample.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInfrared Target Detection Methodologies · Calibration and Measurement Techniques · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
