Coherent population trapping (CPT) versus electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT)
Sumanta Khan, Molahalli Panidhara Kumar, Vineet Bharti, and Vasant, Natarajan

TL;DR
This paper compares coherent population trapping (CPT) and electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT), highlighting their differences through experiments involving rubidium vapor cells and various parameters affecting the phenomena.
Contribution
It provides an experimental analysis of the differences between CPT and EIT, focusing on effects like power, detuning, and buffer gas in rubidium vapor.
Findings
Power affects CPT and EIT differently
Detuning influences the phenomena distinctly
Buffer gas impacts the coherence properties
Abstract
We discuss the differences between two well-studied and related phenomena---coherent population trapping (CPT) and electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT). Many differences between the two---such as the effect of power in the beams, detuning of the beams from resonance, and the use of vapor cells filled with buffer gas---are demonstrated experimentally. The experiments are done using magnetic sublevels of the transition in the D line of Rb.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
