Territorial pattern formation in the absence of an attractive potential
Jonathan R Potts, Mark A Lewis

TL;DR
This paper develops a PDE model demonstrating that territorial patterns can form solely through conspecific avoidance and scent-marking, without the need for attraction to fixed spatial points, supported by analytical proofs.
Contribution
It introduces a PDE model based on individual behavior that explains territorial pattern formation without attraction, extending previous models to include scent detection scales.
Findings
Steady-state patterns form if scent decay is slow enough.
Pattern formation depends on scent detection range.
Analytical method for PDE limit of individual-based models.
Abstract
Territoriality is a phenomenon exhibited throughout nature. On the individual level, it is the processes by which organisms exclude others of the same species from certain parts of space. On the population level, it is the segregation of space into separate areas, each used by subsections of the population. Proving mathematically that such individual-level processes can cause observed population-level patterns to form is necessary for linking these two levels of description in a non-speculative way. Previous mathematical analysis has relied upon assuming animals are attracted to a central area. This can either be a fixed geographical point, such as a den- or nest-site, or a region where they have previously visited. However, recent simulation-based studies suggest that this attractive potential is not necessary for territorial pattern formation. Here, we construct a partial differential…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
