A separation of electrons and protons in the GAMMA-400 gamma-ray telescope
A.A. Leonov, A.M. Galper, V. Bonvicini, N.P. Topchiev, O. Adriani,, R.L. Aptekar, I.V. Arkhangelskaja, A.I. Arkhangelskiy, L. Bergstrom, E., Berti, G. Bigongiari, S.G. Bobkov, M. Boezio, E.A. Bogomolov, S. Bonechi, M., Bongi, S. Bottai, G. Castellini, P.W. Cattaneo, P. Cumani

TL;DR
The paper evaluates GAMMA-400's ability to distinguish electrons and positrons from protons, achieving a rejection factor of around 400,000 for energies between 50 GeV and 1 TeV, enhancing cosmic-ray measurements.
Contribution
It demonstrates the combined detector system's effectiveness in separating electrons/positrons from protons in the GAMMA-400 telescope, with a high rejection factor.
Findings
Proton rejection factor of ~4x10^5 for vertical incidence.
Proton rejection factor of ~3x10^5 at 30-degree inclination.
Effective electron-proton separation in the 50 GeV to 1 TeV range.
Abstract
The GAMMA-400 gamma-ray telescope is intended to measure the fluxes of gamma rays and cosmic-ray electrons and positrons in the energy range from 100 MeV to several TeV. Such measurements concern with the following scientific goals: search for signatures of dark matter, investigation of gamma-ray point and extended sources, studies of the energy spectra of Galactic and extragalactic diffuse emission, studies of gamma-ray bursts and gamma-ray emission from the active Sun, as well as high-precision measurements of spectra of high-energy electrons and positrons, protons, and nuclei up to the knee. The main components of cosmic rays are protons and helium nuclei, whereas the part of lepton component in the total flux is ~10E-3 for high energies. In present paper, the capability of the GAMMA-400 gamma-ray telescope to distinguish electrons and positrons from protons in cosmic rays is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
