A Physical Approach to the Identification of High-z Mergers: Morphological Classification in the Stellar Mass Domain
Anna Cibinel, Emeric Le Floc'h, Valentin Perret, Frederic Bournaud,, Emanuele Daddi, Maurilio Pannella, David Elbaz, Philippe Amram, Pierre-Alain, Duc

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new method for identifying high-redshift galaxy mergers by analyzing stellar mass maps with non-parametric indices, reducing misclassification caused by clumpy star-forming regions in single-band images.
Contribution
It presents a mass-based morphological classification technique calibrated with simulations, improving merger identification accuracy over traditional single-band methods.
Findings
Mass-based indices effectively distinguish real mergers with ~20% contamination.
H-band measurements alone lead to higher contamination (~50%) from clumpy galaxies.
Mass-based classification consistently outperforms H-band in reducing misclassification.
Abstract
At z>1, the distinction between merging and 'normal' star-forming galaxies based on single band morphology is often hampered by the presence of large clumps which result in a disturbed, merger-like appearance even in rotationally supported disks. In this paper we discuss how a classification based on canonical, non-parametric structural indices measured on resolved stellar mass maps, rather than on single-band images, reduces the misclassification of clumpy but not merging galaxies. We calibrate the mass-based selection of mergers using the MIRAGE hydrodynamical numerical simulations of isolated and merging galaxies which span a stellar mass range of - and merger ratios between 1:1-1:6.3. These simulations are processed to reproduce the typical depth and spatial resolution of observed HUDF data. We test our approach on a sample of real z~2 galaxies with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
