nIFTy galaxy cluster simulations I: dark matter & non-radiative models

TL;DR

This study compares twelve different cosmological simulation codes modeling galaxy cluster formation with non-radiative physics, revealing how different numerical methods influence the thermodynamic profiles of the simulated clusters.

Contribution

It provides a detailed comparison of various simulation codes, highlighting the impact of numerical schemes on the thermodynamic properties of galaxy clusters in non-radiative models.

Findings

Mesh-based codes produce extended entropy cores.

Traditional SPH codes show declining entropy profiles.

Modern SPH schemes align closely with grid-based methods.

Abstract

We have simulated the formation of a galaxy cluster in a $\Lambda$CDM universe using twelve different codes modeling only gravity and non-radiative hydrodynamics (\art, \arepo, \hydra\ and 9 incarnations of GADGET). This range of codes includes particle based, moving and fixed mesh codes as well as both Eulerian and Lagrangian fluid schemes. The various GADGET implementations span traditional and advanced smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH) schemes. The goal of this comparison is to assess the reliability of cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of clusters in the simplest astrophysically relevant case, that in which the gas is assumed to be non-radiative. We compare images of the cluster at $z=0$, global properties such as mass, and radial profiles of various dynamical and thermodynamical quantities. The underlying gravitational framework can be aligned very accurately for all the codes allowing a detailed investigation of the differences that develop due to the various gas physics implementations employed. As expected, the mesh-based codes ART and AREPO form extended entropy cores in the gas with rising central gas temperatures. Those codes employing traditional SPH schemes show falling entropy profiles all the way into the very centre with correspondingly rising density profiles and central temperature inversions. We show that methods with modern SPH schemes that allow entropy mixing span the range between these two extremes and the latest SPH variants produce gas entropy profiles that are essentially indistinguishable from those obtained with grid based methods.