On the Complexity of Exchanging
X. Molinero, M. Olsen, M. Serna

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of transforming coalitions in simple games, focusing on the feasibility of rearranging losing coalitions into winning ones and vice versa, across various representations.
Contribution
It provides a complexity analysis of coalition rearrangement problems in simple games, considering different coalition representations and transformation directions.
Findings
Complexity results depend on coalition representation
Transforming losing to winning coalitions is computationally challenging
Results inform the design of algorithms for coalition manipulation
Abstract
We analyze the computational complexity of the problem of deciding whether, for a given simple game, there exists the possibility of rearranging the participants in a set of given losing coalitions into a set of winning coalitions. We also look at the problem of turning winning coalitions into losing coalitions. We analyze the problem when the simple game is represented by a list of wining, losing, minimal winning or maximal loosing coalitions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
