Achieving Multiple Goals via Voluntary Efforts and Motivation Asymmetry

TL;DR

This paper analyzes how groups with multiple goals and varying motivations can successfully achieve objectives despite individual temptations to defect, using mathematical and computational models of multi-goal achievement games.

Contribution

It introduces a generalized framework for multi-goal achievement games with diverse motivations and provides theoretical insights into group performance and success conditions.

Findings

Polarized and biased groups perform well despite defectors.

In N-person, N-goal 'individual purpose games', groups can achieve all goals with high motivation.

Motivational differences can enhance group effectiveness in multi-goal scenarios.

Abstract

The achievement of common goals through voluntary efforts of members of a group can be challenged by the high temptation of individual defection. Here, two-person one-goal assurance games are generalized to N-person, M-goal achievement games in which group members can have different motivations with respect to the achievement of the different goals. The theoretical performance of groups faced with the challenge of multiple simultaneous goals is analyzed mathematically and computationally. For two-goal scenarios one finds that "polarized" as well as "biased" groups perform well in the presence of defectors. A special case, called individual purpose games (N-person, N-goal achievements games where there is a one-to-one mapping between actors and goals for which they have a high achievement motivation) is analyzed in more detail in form of the "importance of being different theorem". It is shown that in some individual purpose games, groups of size N can successfully accomplish N goals, such that each group member is highly motivated towards the achievement of one unique goal. The game-theoretic results suggest that multiple goals as well as differences in motivations can, in some cases, correspond to highly effective groups.